Evidence packet
Two instructions that preserve the target's sense of choice
Graded: Combines several matching elements across text, performance, production, or reception. The source research wrote it as “Strong dialogue + mechanism candidate”
The chain
- Primary text
NewsRadio S02E16, “Houses of the Holy”S02E16:L79
“You don't actually have to listen to them, just pretend to.”
What it proves. That the wording exists in the episode transcript. The dialogue-only file carries no speaker name on this line, so the attribution to Lisa comes from the research documents rather than from the transcript.
Source: Community, NewsRadio and Saved by the Bell scripts and indexes, Project script corpus (internal research document)
- Primary text
Community S01E15, “Romantic Expressionism”S01E15:L145
“You help them realize they want to do it so it can't be traced back to you.”
What it proves. That the wording exists in the episode transcript. Same attribution caveat: the line is unattested in the dialogue file and is assigned to Jeff by the research.
Source: Community, NewsRadio and Saved by the Bell scripts and indexes, Project script corpus (internal research document)
- Project synthesis
Show Bible §49, Houses of the Holy dossier
What it proves. The project's argument that the two instructions share one mechanism: the controller keeps the outcome while the target keeps the feeling of agency. The Bible itself rates this below the Joe-to-Troy case until a closer dialogue or production bridge appears.
Source: Community Show Bible, Project research (Google Docs) (internal research document)
- Primary text
Community S01E11, “The Politics of Human Sexuality”
What it proves. That the same behaviour appears earlier, when Jeff gathers Sabrina's likes and dislikes from the Dean and performs them back to her. It shows the function is portable rather than the property of one scene.
Source: Community, NewsRadio and Saved by the Bell scripts and indexes, Project script corpus (internal research document)
Both sides open with the same three words, which is why the row is rated on dialogue as well as mechanism. Neither side is speaker-attested in the transcript files, and no production evidence connects the two scenes. This is a mechanism candidate, not a documented borrowing.
Sources
- Community, NewsRadio and Saved by the Bell scripts and indexes, Project script corpus, 2026-09-19What it proves: That a given wording appears in a given episode's transcript. It does not prove who said it unless the line is speaker-attested.
- Community Show Bible, Project research (Google Docs), 2026-09-22What it proves: Nothing on its own. It is the canonical statement of the project's evidence standard and its episode dossiers.